Vereen v. State
637 So. 2d 386, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 5671, 1994 WL 248272
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 10, 1994
DocketNo. 94-691
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 637 So. 2d 386 (Vereen v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Vereen v. State, 637 So. 2d 386, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 5671, 1994 WL 248272 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).
Opinion
Affirmed without prejudice to resubmit the Rule 3.850 motion with the proper oath. See Van Tassell v. State, 601 So.2d 318 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992).1
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Saba v. State
677 So. 2d 41 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
637 So. 2d 386, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 5671, 1994 WL 248272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vereen-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.