Vereen v. State

637 So. 2d 386, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 5671, 1994 WL 248272
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 10, 1994·No. No. 94-691·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to resubmit the Rule 3.850 motion with the proper oath. See Van Tassell v. State, 601 So.2d 318 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992).1

AFFIRMED.

PETERSON, GRIFFIN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vereen v. State, 637 So. 2d 386, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 5671, 1994 WL 248272 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

637 So. 2d 386 (Vereen v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Saba v. State
677 So. 2d 41 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)