Van Tassell v. State

601 So. 2d 318, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8495, 1992 WL 171370
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 24, 1992·No. No. 92-1534·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Richard Van Tassell appeals the summary denial of his rule 3.850 motion. We affirm the denial without prejudice to Van Tassell to resubmit his motion to the trial court with the proper oath. See Young v. State, 585 So.2d 1184 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991).

AFFIRMED.

COBB, COWART and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Van Tassell v. State, 601 So. 2d 318, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8495, 1992 WL 171370 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

601 So. 2d 318 (Van Tassell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vereen v. State
637 So. 2d 386 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Green v. State
635 So. 2d 159 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)