Van Tassell v. State

601 So. 2d 318, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8495, 1992 WL 171370
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 24, 1992
DocketNo. 92-1534
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 601 So. 2d 318 (Van Tassell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Van Tassell v. State, 601 So. 2d 318, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8495, 1992 WL 171370 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Richard Van Tassell appeals the summary denial of his rule 3.850 motion. We affirm the denial without prejudice to Van Tassell to resubmit his motion to the trial court with the proper oath. See Young v. State, 585 So.2d 1184 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991).

AFFIRMED.

COBB, COWART and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vereen v. State
637 So. 2d 386 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Green v. State
635 So. 2d 159 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
601 So. 2d 318, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8495, 1992 WL 171370, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-tassell-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.