Verduce v. Board of Higher Education
8 N.Y.2d 928
Opinion
[930] Judgment reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. On the particular facts of this case, and for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in the Appellate Division, issues of fact were presented which should have been submitted to a jury. No opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis and Foster. Taking no part: Judge Burke.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Verduce v. Board of Higher Education, 8 N.Y.2d 928 (N.Y. 1960).
8 N.Y.2d 928 (Verduce v. Board of Higher Education) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Verduce v. BD. OF HIGHER EDUC. IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK
168 N.E.2d 838 (New York Court of Appeals, 1960)