Home/New York Court of Appeals/Verduce v. BD. OF HIGHER EDUC. IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK

Verduce v. BD. OF HIGHER EDUC. IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK

168 N.E.2d 838, 8 N.Y.2d 928
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 10, 1960
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 168 N.E.2d 838 (Verduce v. BD. OF HIGHER EDUC. IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Verduce v. BD. OF HIGHER EDUC. IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK, 168 N.E.2d 838, 8 N.Y.2d 928 (N.Y. 1960).

Opinion

8 N.Y.2d 928 (1960)

Rosalie A. Verduce et al., Appellants,
v.
Board of Higher Education in the City of New York, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued May 23, 1960.
Decided June 10, 1960.

Benjamin H. Siff and Lester Lewis Jay for appellants.

Charles H. Tenney, Corporation Counsel (Alfred Weinstein, Seymour B. Quel and Stanley Katz of counsel), for respondent.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS and FOSTER. Taking no part: Judge BURKE.

Judgment reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. On the particular facts of this case, and for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in the Appellate Division, issues of fact were presented which should have been submitted to a jury. No opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wolf v. City of New York
349 N.E.2d 858 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
168 N.E.2d 838, 8 N.Y.2d 928, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/verduce-v-bd-of-higher-educ-in-the-city-of-new-yor-ny-1960.