Vera v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Vera v. State

886 So. 2d 251, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 15407, 2004 WL 2347562

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 20, 2004

DocketNo. 3D04-864

StatusPublished

This text of 886 So. 2d 251 (Vera v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vera v. State, 886 So. 2d 251, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 15407, 2004 WL 2347562 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

CONFESSIÓN OF ERROR

PER CURIAM,

The defendant below was sentenced upon a revocation of probation on the basis of a guidelines'score sheet which included forty victim injury points for sexual, penetration. As the state candidly, commendably, and correctly concedes, however, those points were erroneously 'added because the underlying crimes, including burglary with an assault “by choking the victim,” were not sexual offenses for which victim injury points could properly be assessed. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.702(d)(5). See Brown v. State, 700 So.2d 447 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997), quashed on other grounds, 719 So.2d 882 (Fla.1998); Geary v. State, 675 So.2d 625 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996), review denied, 680 So.2d 422 (Fla.1996); Jackson v. State, 680 So.2d 1102 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996).

Accordingly, the appellant’s sentence is vacated and the cause remanded for resen-tencing upon an appropriate guidelines score sheet.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CONFESSIÓN OF ERROR

PER CURIAM,

The defendant below was sentenced upon a revocation of probation on the basis of a guidelines'score sheet which included forty victim injury points for sexual, penetration. As the state candidly, commendably, and correctly concedes, however, those points were erroneously 'added because the underlying crimes, including burglary with an assault “by choking the victim,” were not sexual offenses for which victim injury points could properly be assessed. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.702(d)(5). See Brown v. State, 700 So.2d 447 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997), quashed on other grounds, 719 So.2d 882 (Fla.1998); Geary v. State, 675 So.2d 625 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996), review denied, 680 So.2d 422 (Fla.1996); Jackson v. State, 680 So.2d 1102 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996).

Accordingly, the appellant’s sentence is vacated and the cause remanded for resen-tencing upon an appropriate guidelines score sheet.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

886 So. 2d 251, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 15407, 2004 WL 2347562, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vera-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack