Vera v. Gonzales
This text of 235 F. App'x 637 (Vera v. Gonzales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Jaime Juarez Vera, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order adopting an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying his application for suspension of deportation. We review de novo claims of due process violations in immigration proceedings, Sanchez-Cruz v. INS, 255 F.3d 775, 779 (9th Cir.2001), and deny the petition for review.
Juarez Vera’s contention that the immigration judge deprived him of due process by applying an erroneous standard and failing to consider all his hardship evidence is not supported by the record. See Ramirez-Perez v. Ashcroft, 336 F.3d 1001, 1004-1006 (9th Cir.2003); Colmenar v. INS, 210 F.3d 967, 971 (9th Cir.2000) (citation omitted). The IJ applied each of the factors in Matter of Anderson, 16 I. & N. Dec. 596 (BIA 1978) to determine that Juarez Vera failed to establish extreme hardship to himself or a qualifying relative.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
235 F. App'x 637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vera-v-gonzales-ca9-2007.