Venture v. Macquarrie

651 So. 2d 716, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 1184, 1995 WL 51116
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 10, 1995
DocketNo. 94-788
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 651 So. 2d 716 (Venture v. Macquarrie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Venture v. Macquarrie, 651 So. 2d 716, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 1184, 1995 WL 51116 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully reviewed the entire record and conclude that competent substantial evidence does not exist to support both of the elements necessary for a modification of child custody. See Ackerson v. Murphy, 622 So.2d 154 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). See, e.g., Kelly v. Kelly, 642 So.2d 800 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). We remand for entry of an order restoring the custody arrangement to that contained in the parties’ property settlement agreement as adopted by the trial court m the final judgment of dissolution of marriage.

Because of the expedited nature of this appeal, no motion for rehearing shall be entertained.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

COBB, GOSHORN and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Venture v. MacQuarrie
654 So. 2d 1305 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
651 So. 2d 716, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 1184, 1995 WL 51116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/venture-v-macquarrie-fladistctapp-1995.