Venture v. Macquarrie

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Venture v. Macquarrie

651 So. 2d 716, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 1184, 1995 WL 51116

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 10, 1995·No. No. 94-788·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully reviewed the entire record and conclude that competent substantial evidence does not exist to support both of the elements necessary for a modification of child custody. See Ackerson v. Murphy, 622 So.2d 154 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). See, e.g., Kelly v. Kelly, 642 So.2d 800 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). We remand for entry of an order restoring the custody arrangement to that contained in the parties’ property settlement agreement as adopted by the trial court m the final judgment of dissolution of marriage.

Because of the expedited nature of this appeal, no motion for rehearing shall be entertained.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

COBB, GOSHORN and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully reviewed the entire record and conclude that competent substantial evidence does not exist to support both of the elements necessary for a modification of child custody. See Ackerson v. Murphy, 622 So.2d 154 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). See, e.g., Kelly v. Kelly, 642 So.2d 800 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). We remand for entry of an order restoring the custody arrangement to that contained in the parties’ property settlement agreement as adopted by the trial court m the final judgment of dissolution of marriage.

Because of the expedited nature of this appeal, no motion for rehearing shall be entertained.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

COBB, GOSHORN and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.

Venture v. Macquarrie, 651 So. 2d 716, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 1184, 1995 WL 51116 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

651 So. 2d 716 (Venture v. Macquarrie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related