Venture Development Group, Inc. v. Preferred Security Components

650 A.2d 406, 539 Pa. 33, 1994 Pa. LEXIS 568
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 21, 1994·No. Petition No. 179 M.D.Alloc.Dkt.1994·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 21st day of October, 1994, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is granted, the order of the Superior Court entered January 6, 1994 affirming the dismissal of Petitioner’s post-trial motions by the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County is reversed, see DeAngelis v. Newman, 501 Pa. 144, 460 A.2d 730 (1983) and Brogan, Inc. v. Holmes Electric Protective Co. of Philadelphia, 501 Pa. 234, 460 A.2d 1093 (1983), and the case is remanded to the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County for consideration of Petitioner’s post-trial motions.

MONTEMURO, J., is sitting by designation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Venture Development Group, Inc. v. Preferred Security Components, 650 A.2d 406, 539 Pa. 33, 1994 Pa. LEXIS 568 (Pa. 1994).

650 A.2d 406 (Venture Development Group, Inc. v. Preferred Security Components) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

DeAngelis v. Newman
460 A.2d 730 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1983)
Byard F. Brogan, Inc. v. Holmes Electric Protective Co.
460 A.2d 1093 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1983)