Venture Development Group, Inc. v. Preferred Security Components

650 A.2d 406
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedOctober 21, 1994
StatusPublished

This text of 650 A.2d 406 (Venture Development Group, Inc. v. Preferred Security Components) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Venture Development Group, Inc. v. Preferred Security Components, 650 A.2d 406 (Pa. 1994).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 21st day of October, 1994, the Petition for Alowance of Appeal is granted, the order of the Superior Court entered January 6, 1994 affirming the dismissal of Petitioner’s post-trial motions by the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County is reversed, see DeAngelis v. Newman, 501 Pa. 144, 460 A.2d 730 (1983) and Brogan, Inc. v. Holmes Electric Protective Co. of Philadelphia, 501 Pa. 234, 460 A.2d 1093 (1983), and the case is remanded to the Court of Com[407]*407mon Pleas of Lancaster County for consideration of Petitioner’s post-trial motions.

MONTEMURO, J., is sitting by designation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

DeAngelis v. Newman
460 A.2d 730 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1983)
Byard F. Brogan, Inc. v. Holmes Electric Protective Co.
460 A.2d 1093 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
650 A.2d 406, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/venture-development-group-inc-v-preferred-security-components-pa-1994.