Venture Development Group, Inc. v. Preferred Security Components

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Venture Development Group, Inc. v. Preferred Security Components

650 A.2d 406

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 21, 1994·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 21st day of October, 1994, the Petition for Alowance of Appeal is granted, the order of the Superior Court entered January 6, 1994 affirming the dismissal of Petitioner’s post-trial motions by the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County is reversed, see DeAngelis v. Newman, 501 Pa. 144, 460 A.2d 730 (1983) and Brogan, Inc. v. Holmes Electric Protective Co. of Philadelphia, 501 Pa. 234, 460 A.2d 1093 (1983), and the case is remanded to the Court of Com[407]*407mon Pleas of Lancaster County for consideration of Petitioner’s post-trial motions.

MONTEMURO, J., is sitting by designation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 21st day of October, 1994, the Petition for Alowance of Appeal is granted, the order of the Superior Court entered January 6, 1994 affirming the dismissal of Petitioner’s post-trial motions by the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County is reversed, see DeAngelis v. Newman, 501 Pa. 144, 460 A.2d 730 (1983) and Brogan, Inc. v. Holmes Electric Protective Co. of Philadelphia, 501 Pa. 234, 460 A.2d 1093 (1983), and the case is remanded to the Court of Com[407]*407mon Pleas of Lancaster County for consideration of Petitioner’s post-trial motions.

MONTEMURO, J., is sitting by designation.

Venture Development Group, Inc. v. Preferred Security Components, 650 A.2d 406 (Pa. 1994).

Pincite

650 A.2d 406 (Venture Development Group, Inc. v. Preferred Security Components) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related