Ventura v. Chhabra

2021 NY Slip Op 03430
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 1, 2021
DocketIndex No. 24421/18E Appeal No. 13987 Case No. 2020-01652
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2021 NY Slip Op 03430 (Ventura v. Chhabra) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ventura v. Chhabra, 2021 NY Slip Op 03430 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

Ventura v Chhabra (2021 NY Slip Op 03430)
Ventura v Chhabra
2021 NY Slip Op 03430
Decided on June 01, 2021
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: June 01, 2021
Before: Kern, J.P., Moulton, González, Scarpulla, JJ.

Index No. 24421/18E Appeal No. 13987 Case No. 2020-01652

[*1]Marlene Aponte Ventura, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v

Devender N. Chhabra, DMD et al., Defendants-Respondents, Manhattan Dental Specialists, PLLC, Defendant.


Miller, Leiby & Associates, P.C., New York (Ernest N. Reece of counsel), for appellant.



Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Joseph Capella, J.), entered on or about November 27, 2019, which denied plaintiff's motion for a default judgment against defendants Devender N. Chhabra, DMD, Hanuman Oral Surgery Care PLLC and Martin Gray Safran, D.D.S. and dismissed the complaint as abandoned pursuant to CPLR 3215(c), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court properly determined that plaintiff failed to establish sufficient cause why the complaint should not be dismissed as abandoned pursuant to CPLR 3215(c) (see U.S. Bank N.A. v Nunez, 190 AD3d 660 [1st Dept 2021]). The excuse plaintiff offered for her delay in seeking a default judgment was not reasonable: that she failed to notify her counsel that she moved to Puerto Rico, that her counsel had to hire an investigator to locate her to sign the affidavits of merit annexed to her moving papers after she moved to Puerto Rico, and that she did not return the affidavits of merit which were sent to her for several months. THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: June 1, 2021



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ventura v. Chhabra
2021 NY Slip Op 03430 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2021 NY Slip Op 03430, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ventura-v-chhabra-nyappdiv-2021.