Ventura-Lopez v. Department of Revenue, Tc-Md 081060b (or.tax 1-30-2009)

Oregon Tax Court

Ventura-Lopez v. Department of Revenue, Tc-Md 081060b (or.tax 1-30-2009)

DecidedJanuary 30, 2009

DocketTC-MD 081060B.

StatusPublished

This text of Ventura-Lopez v. Department of Revenue, Tc-Md 081060b (or.tax 1-30-2009) (Ventura-Lopez v. Department of Revenue, Tc-Md 081060b (or.tax 1-30-2009)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ventura-Lopez v. Department of Revenue, Tc-Md 081060b (or.tax 1-30-2009), (Or. Super. Ct. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

DECISION OF DISMISSAL This matter is before the court on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, filed with its Answer on November 20, 2008, requesting that the Amended Complaint be dismissed.

A case management conference was held January 15, 2009, in Salem, Oregon. Maria Ventura-Lopez represented Plaintiff. Faith Derickson and Laurie Fery, tax auditors, appeared for Defendant.

Plaintiff does not disagree with the personal income tax amounts assessed for tax years 2002 through 2005. Instead, he asks for a waiver of charges for interest and certain late-filing penalties. The authority to waive or reduce such penalties and interest lies with Defendant. ORS305.145(3) and (4). Plaintiff's representative indicated she would pursue administrative relief through a request made directly to the assigned revenue agent. Now, therefore, *Page 2 IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that this matter be dismissed.

Dated this _____ day of January 2009.

If you want to appeal this Decision, file a Complaint in the RegularDivision of the Oregon Tax Court, by mailing to: 1163 State Street,Salem, OR 97301-2563; or by hand delivery to: Fourth Floor, 1241 StateStreet, Salem, OR. Your Complaint must be submitted within 60 days after the date of theDecision or this Decision becomes final and cannot be changed. This document was signed by Magistrate Jeffrey S. Mattson on January30, 2009. The Court filed and entered this document on January 30,2009. *Page 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DECISION OF DISMISSAL This matter is before the court on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, filed with its Answer on November 20, 2008, requesting that the Amended Complaint be dismissed.

A case management conference was held January 15, 2009, in Salem, Oregon. Maria Ventura-Lopez represented Plaintiff. Faith Derickson and Laurie Fery, tax auditors, appeared for Defendant.

Plaintiff does not disagree with the personal income tax amounts assessed for tax years 2002 through 2005. Instead, he asks for a waiver of charges for interest and certain late-filing penalties. The authority to waive or reduce such penalties and interest lies with Defendant. ORS305.145(3) and (4). Plaintiff's representative indicated she would pursue administrative relief through a request made directly to the assigned revenue agent. Now, therefore, *Page 2 IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that this matter be dismissed.

Dated this _____ day of January 2009.

If you want to appeal this Decision, file a Complaint in the RegularDivision of the Oregon Tax Court, by mailing to: 1163 State Street,Salem, OR 97301-2563; or by hand delivery to: Fourth Floor, 1241 StateStreet, Salem, OR. Your Complaint must be submitted within 60 days after the date of theDecision or this Decision becomes final and cannot be changed. This document was signed by Magistrate Jeffrey S. Mattson on January30, 2009. The Court filed and entered this document on January 30,2009. *Page 1

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Ventura-Lopez v. Department of Revenue, Tc-Md 081060b (or.tax 1-30-2009), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ventura-lopez-v-department-of-revenue-tc-md-081060b-ortax-1-30-2009-ortc-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack