Ventrone v. United States

Second Circuit

Ventrone v. United States

239 F.2d 862

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided January 7, 1957·No. No. 51, Docket 24022·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal raises only questions of ' fact. The trial judge discredited the testimony of the libelant’s three witnesses for reasons stated in his opinion, and found that the vessel was not unsea-worthy, that the respondent was not negligent, and that the accident resulted from carelessness or inattention to duty on the part of libelant’s fellow longshoreman. The decree is affirmed on the opinion below, reported in D.C., 134 F.Supp. 169.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal raises only questions of ' fact. The trial judge discredited the testimony of the libelant’s three witnesses for reasons stated in his opinion, and found that the vessel was not unsea-worthy, that the respondent was not negligent, and that the accident resulted from carelessness or inattention to duty on the part of libelant’s fellow longshoreman. The decree is affirmed on the opinion below, reported in D.C., 134 F.Supp. 169.

Ventrone v. United States, 239 F.2d 862 (2d Cir. 1957).

Pincite

239 F.2d 862 (Ventrone v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related