Venezia v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Venezia v. City of New York

280 A.D.2d 406, 720 N.Y.S.2d 783, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1730

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 22, 2001

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 280 A.D.2d 406 (Venezia v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Venezia v. City of New York, 280 A.D.2d 406, 720 N.Y.S.2d 783, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1730 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Shulman, J.), entered on or about May 30, 2000, which granted defendant’s motion to extend its time to answer the amended complaint and denied plaintiffs cross motion for a default judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant’s time to answer the amended complaint was properly extended upon a showing of a reasonable excuse for its failure to timely answer based on law office failure, and a meritorious defense (CPLR 3012 [d]; 2005; see, Tewari v Tsoutsouras, 75 NY2d 1, 12-13; 38 Holding Corp. v City of New York, 179 AD2d 486, 487). Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Tom, Lerner, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Shulman, J.), entered on or about May 30, 2000, which granted defendant’s motion to extend its time to answer the amended complaint and denied plaintiffs cross motion for a default judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant’s time to answer the amended complaint was properly extended upon a showing of a reasonable excuse for its failure to timely answer based on law office failure, and a meritorious defense (CPLR 3012 [d]; 2005; see, Tewari v Tsoutsouras, 75 NY2d 1, 12-13; 38 Holding Corp. v City of New York, 179 AD2d 486, 487). Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Tom, Lerner, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

280 A.D.2d 406, 720 N.Y.S.2d 783, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1730, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/venezia-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack