Veney v. United States

666 A.2d 63, 1995 WL 668396
District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided October 20, 1995·No. No. 93-CF-456·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of appellant’s petition for rehearing en banc, and the opposition thereto; and it appearing that the majority of the judges of this court has voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc, it is

ORDERED that appellant’s petition for rehearing en banc is granted and that the opinion and judgment of April 20, 1995, are hereby vacated. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall schedule this matter for argument before the court sitting en bane as soon as the calendar permits. Counsel are hereby directed to provide ten copies of the briefs heretofore filed to the Clerk on or before October 31, 1995.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Veney v. United States, 666 A.2d 63, 1995 WL 668396 (D.C. 1995).

666 A.2d 63 (Veney v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Veney v. United States
681 A.2d 428 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1996)