Venanzio v. Weir

72 N.Y.S. 234, 64 A.D. 483

Opinion

JENKS, J.

The sole ground of the motion was that section 3268 of the Code of Civil Procedure violates the fourteenth amendment of the constitution of the United States of America. This amendment merely requires that all persons subjected to legislation shall receive like treatment under like circumstances and conditions. Class legislation, discriminating against some, and favoring others, is prohibited ; but legislation which, carrying out a public purpose, is limited in its application, if within the sphere of its operation it affects alike all persons similarly situated, is not within the amendment. Barbier v. Connolly, 113 U. S. 27, 32, 5 Sup. Ct. 357, 28 L. Ed. 923; Missouri v. Lewis, 101 U. S. 22, 25 L. Ed. 989; Hayes v. Missouri, 120 U. S. 68, 7 Sup. Ct. 350, 30 L. Ed. 578; Conley v. Institution, 11 R. I. 147.

The order should be affirmed, without costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Venanzio v. Weir, 72 N.Y.S. 234, 64 A.D. 483 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1901).

72 N.Y.S. 234 (Venanzio v. Weir) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Missouri v. Lewis
101 U.S. 22 (Supreme Court, 1880)
Barbier v. Connolly
113 U.S. 27 (Supreme Court, 1884)
Hayes v. Missouri
120 U.S. 68 (Supreme Court, 1887)