Venanzio v. Weir
Opinion
The sole ground of the motion was that section 3268 of the Code of Civil Procedure violates the fourteenth amendment of the Con[484]*484stitution of the United States of America. This amendment merely requires that all persons subjected to legislation shall receive' like treatment -under■like, -circumstances'- and. conditions.■.' OMss legislation discriminating! against some and favoring others is prohibited ; but legislation which, carrying out a public purpose; is limited in its application,' if within the sphere of its -operation it affects alike all persons similarly situated, is not within the amendment. (Barbier v. Connolly, 113 U. S. 27, 32; Missouri v. Lewis, 101 id. 22; Hayes v. Missouri, 120 id. 68; Conley v. Woonsocket Institution for Savings, 11 R. I. 147.)
The order should be affirmed, without costs.
Goodrich, P. J., Woodward, Hirschberg and Sewell, JJ., concurred.
Order affirmed, without costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
64 A.D. 483 (Venanzio v. Weir) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.