Vekiarelis v. Del Villar

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Vekiarelis v. Del Villar

286 A.D.2d 464, 730 N.Y.S.2d 443, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8172

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 22, 2001

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 286 A.D.2d 464 (Vekiarelis v. Del Villar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vekiarelis v. Del Villar, 286 A.D.2d 464, 730 N.Y.S.2d 443, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8172 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to Election Law § 16-102, inter alia, to invalidate a petition designating Angel Del Villar as a candidate in a primary election to be held on September 11, 2001, for the nomination of the Democratic Party as its candidate for the public office of Member of the City Council for the 21st Council District, the petitioners appeal from a final order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Flug, J.), dated August 14, 2001, which, after a hearing, denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the final order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court properly denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding to invalidate the designating petition, as all of the substantive requirements of witness identification were satisfied (see, Election Law § 6-132 [2]; Matter of Hurst v Board of Elections, 265 AD2d 590). Bracken, P. J., Luciano, Feuerstein, Schmidt and Adams, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to Election Law § 16-102, inter alia, to invalidate a petition designating Angel Del Villar as a candidate in a primary election to be held on September 11, 2001, for the nomination of the Democratic Party as its candidate for the public office of Member of the City Council for the 21st Council District, the petitioners appeal from a final order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Flug, J.), dated August 14, 2001, which, after a hearing, denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the final order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court properly denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding to invalidate the designating petition, as all of the substantive requirements of witness identification were satisfied (see, Election Law § 6-132 [2]; Matter of Hurst v Board of Elections, 265 AD2d 590). Bracken, P. J., Luciano, Feuerstein, Schmidt and Adams, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

286 A.D.2d 464, 730 N.Y.S.2d 443, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vekiarelis-v-del-villar-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack