Del Villar v. Board of Elections

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Del Villar v. Board of Elections

286 A.D.2d 455, 730 N.Y.S.2d 443, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8176

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 22, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 286 A.D.2d 455 (Del Villar v. Board of Elections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Del Villar v. Board of Elections, 286 A.D.2d 455, 730 N.Y.S.2d 443, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8176 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to Election Law § 16-102, inter alia, to validate a petition designating Angel Del Villar as a candidate in a primary election to be held on September 11, 2001, for the [456]*456nomination of the Democratic Party as its candidate for the public office of Member of the City Council, City of New York, for the 21st Council District, the petitioner appeals from a final order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Plug, J.), dated August 14, 2001, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding as academic.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements, in light of our determination in Matter of Vekiarelis v Del Villar (286 AD2d 464 [decided herewith]). Bracken, P. J., Luciano, Feuerstein, Schmidt and Adams, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding pursuant to Election Law § 16-102, inter alia, to validate a petition designating Angel Del Villar as a candidate in a primary election to be held on September 11, 2001, for the [456]*456nomination of the Democratic Party as its candidate for the public office of Member of the City Council, City of New York, for the 21st Council District, the petitioner appeals from a final order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Plug, J.), dated August 14, 2001, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding as academic.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements, in light of our determination in Matter of Vekiarelis v Del Villar (286 AD2d 464 [decided herewith]). Bracken, P. J., Luciano, Feuerstein, Schmidt and Adams, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

286 A.D.2d 455, 730 N.Y.S.2d 443, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/del-villar-v-board-of-elections-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack