Vekaria v. MThree Corporate Consulting, Ltd.

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided May 8, 2025·No. 1:22-cv-03197·Unknown

Opinion

UsVDC SDINY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOC #: SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK | DATE FILED: _ 5/8/2025 wae KX JITENDRA VEKARIA, Plaintiff, Case No. 1:22-cv-03197-JPC-HJR v. MTHREE CORPORATE CONSULTING, LTD., Defendant. wee K STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and among the parties hereto, through their undersigned counsel, that the following provisions of this Stipulation and Protective Order (the "Order") shall govern disclosure and use by the parties of all documents, testimony, exhibits, interrogatory answers, responses to requests to admit and any other materials and information disclosed or provided in the above-referenced action (the "Action"). 1. Disclosure and discovery activity in this action may involve the production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure, as defined further herein, may be warranted, and as such agree to the following terms. 2. When used in this Order, the term: a. "Confidential Information" shall mean all documents and testimony, and all information contained therein, containing: i. Trade secrets or other confidential research, confidential development information, confidential financial information, confidential proprietary information, or

confidential commercial information that may be subject to a protective order under FRCP 26(c)(1)(G); or ii. Confidential, non-public personal information that is protected from disclosure by statute, regulation or otherwise.

b. "Disclosing Party" shall refer to any party to this Action and any non-party disclosing or producing Confidential Information in connection with this Action. c. "Receiving Party" shall refer to any party to this Action and any non-party that receives Confidential Information. d. "Discovery Material" shall refer to all items or information produced or generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this Action, regardless of the medium or manner in which it was stored, generated, or maintained. e. "Document" shall have the same meaning as provided in Rule 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Civil Rule 26.3, and shall include, without limitation, all original, written, recorded, electronic, or graphic materials, and all copies, duplicates or abstracts

thereof including, but not limited to, notes on documents including information contained therein or derived therefrom. f. "Information" shall include individual documents and records (including associated metadata) whether on paper, film or other media, as discrete files stored electronically, optically, or magnetically, or as a record within a database, archive, or container file, including emails, messages, word processed documents, digital presentations, spreadsheets, and database content. 3. A Disclosing Party’s designation of Discovery Material as Confidential Information constitutes a representation that such Discovery Material has been reviewed by counsel and that there is a reasonable basis for such designation. Nothing herein permits the Disclosing Party to make blanket designations of confidentiality, but rather such marking must be specific to only those documents which satisfy the criteria set forth in § 2 herein. 4. Unless otherwise ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the Disclosing Party,

a Receiving Party may disclose Confidential Information only to: a. Counsel of record in this Action, as well as counsel's employees to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information in connection with this Action; b. The named parties, including in-house counsel, officers, directors, and employees of the Receiving Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this Action; c. Experts, consultants, or investigators including their staff who have signed the Acknowledgment attached hereto as Exhibit A; d. Outside photocopying, microfilming, or database service providers, trial support firms, graphic production services, litigation support services, and translators engaged by the parties during this Action to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this Action;

e. The court, any court to which a party petitions for discovery of a non-party, any appellate court, necessary court personnel, and jurors; f. Court reporters and their staff, stenographers or video operators, professional jury or trial consultants, mock jurors, and professional vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this Action; g. During their depositions and deposition preparation, witnesses in the Action to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary and who signed the Acknowledgment attached hereto as Exhibit A (although such individuals shall not be permitted to retain any copies of confidential documents); h. Any mediator or arbitrator engaged by the named parties in connection with this Action; i. The author or recipient of a document containing the Confidential Information or a custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information; and

j. Other persons only after notice to all parties and upon order of the Court, or upon written consent of the Disclosing Party. 5. If either party later determines that an additional category of confidential information should be created to afford greater protection for documents they intend to produce that contain extremely sensitive information, whereby disclosure would create a substantial risk of serious harm that could not be avoided by less restrictive means, (e.g., “Highly Confidential”) then that party will provide notice to the receiving party and will draft a proposed amendment to this Stipulation and Protective Order. The parties will then meet and confer within a reasonable amount of time after such notice, and will discuss whether the amendment should be submitted for the Court’s consideration.

6. Designation of documents or other material as containing Confidential Information as set forth in Paragraphs 4 of this Order may be made at or prior to the time of production of documents by stamping or otherwise affixing the legend “CONFIDENTIAL-SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER" on each page deemed Confidential, in a manner that does not interfere with the legibility of the document. The Disclosing Party must limit designations of Confidential Information to only those parts of documents, testimony, or material that are clearly identified as containing Confidential Information. When Confidential Information is disclosed in a form not appropriate for such placing or affixing, such Confidential Information shall be designated as Confidential in writing at the time it is delivered to the Receiving Party. 7. A Disclosing Party may designate as Confidential any portion of a transcript and/or recording from a deposition or a transcript and/or recording from other pretrial or trial proceedings deemed to contain such material. The Disclosing Party shall advise the court reporter and counsel of record at the beginning and end of the testimony containing Confidential Information

("Confidential Testimony") either orally at the deposition or in writing no later than forty-five (45) calendar days after receipt from the court reporter of the final deposition transcript and/or recording. During such forty-five day period, the parties shall treat the entire transcript and/or recording as Confidential. The reporter shall mark “CONFIDENTIAL-SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER" on the face of the transcript at the beginning and end of any portions of Confidential Testimony.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vekaria v. MThree Corporate Consulting, Ltd., (S.D.N.Y. 2025).

Vekaria v. MThree Corporate Consulting, Ltd. (Vekaria v. MThree Corporate Consulting, Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga
435 F.3d 110 (Second Circuit, 2006)