Veitch v. Veitch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Veitch v. Veitch

6 A.D.3d 1093, 775 N.Y.S.2d 635

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 30, 2004

DocketAppeal No. 1

StatusPublished

This text of 6 A.D.3d 1093 (Veitch v. Veitch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Veitch v. Veitch, 6 A.D.3d 1093, 775 N.Y.S.2d 635 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Ontario County (James R. Harvey, [1094]*1094A.J.), entered December 6, 2002 in a divorce action. The judgment, insofar as appealed from, awarded plaintiff supervised visitation with the parties’ child and ordered plaintiff to pay child support in the amount of $143 per week, to obtain a $100,000 term life insurance policy for the benefit of the child, and to pay 100% of the health care and child care expenses of the child.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Matter of Eric D. [appeal No. 1], 162 AD2d 1051 [1990]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Pine, Wisner, Scudder and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Ontario County (James R. Harvey, [1094]*1094A.J.), entered December 6, 2002 in a divorce action. The judgment, insofar as appealed from, awarded plaintiff supervised visitation with the parties’ child and ordered plaintiff to pay child support in the amount of $143 per week, to obtain a $100,000 term life insurance policy for the benefit of the child, and to pay 100% of the health care and child care expenses of the child.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Matter of Eric D. [appeal No. 1], 162 AD2d 1051 [1990]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Pine, Wisner, Scudder and Lawton, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 A.D.3d 1093, 775 N.Y.S.2d 635, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/veitch-v-veitch-nyappdiv-2004.