Vehlewald v. State

292 S.W.3d 590, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1365, 2009 WL 2949422
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 15, 2009·No. ED 91899·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael Vehlewald appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vehlewald v. State, 292 S.W.3d 590, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1365, 2009 WL 2949422 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

292 S.W.3d 590 (Vehlewald v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Long v. State
292 S.W.3d 590 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)