Long v. State

292 S.W.3d 590, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1351, 2009 WL 2949379
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 15, 2009·No. ED 92159·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

James Long (“movant”) appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his request for post-conviction relief pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rule 29.15 without an evidentiary hearing. Movant claims the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion because he was denied effective assistance of counsel.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Long v. State, 292 S.W.3d 590, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1351, 2009 WL 2949379 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

292 S.W.3d 590 (Long v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vehlewald v. State
292 S.W.3d 590 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)