Veazey v. Stewart

472 S.W.2d 102, 251 Ark. 334, 1971 Ark. LEXIS 1140
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedNovember 1, 1971
Docket5-5701
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 472 S.W.2d 102 (Veazey v. Stewart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Veazey v. Stewart, 472 S.W.2d 102, 251 Ark. 334, 1971 Ark. LEXIS 1140 (Ark. 1971).

Opinion

Conley Byrd, Justice.

This is an action by appellee Mrs. Adell Stewart, a grandmother, against appellants Guy Veazey, stepfather and Jo Ella Veasey, mother, to obtain visitation privileges with Linda Kennedy, a minor daughter of appellee’s deceased son. The trial court granted such visitation rights and we reverse.

Jo Ella Kennedy Veazey was the wife of Jimmy Lee Kennedy, appellee’s son, until his death on November 23, 1968. To that marriage was born Linda Kennedy, now age 10. This action was instituted after Jo Ella’s marriage to appellant Guy Veazey on October 3, 1969. It is conceded that Jo Ella has been and is a good mother.

Appellee recognizes that under the general law there is no right of visitation enforceable by injunction in favor of a grandparent with respect to a grandchild when a natural parent having custody resists or objects. Yet she takes the position that, “Equity regards that as done which ought to be done”, and that the right of visitation should be accorded a good grandmother in an exceptional case. However in this case there is nothing that shows anything other than a normal grandchild-grandmother relationship in which the grandmother willingly did some Friday night baby sitting.

Appellee points out that the grandparents in Parks v. Crowley, 221 Ark. 340, 253 S. W. 2d 561 (1952), were granted visitation privileges. The visitation privileges there grew out of a child custody action. Here it is admitted that this is not a child custody action.

Reversed and dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bethany v. Jones
2011 Ark. 67 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2011)
Hendershot v. Hendershot
785 S.W.2d 34 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 1990)
Cox v. Stayton
619 S.W.2d 617 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1981)
Quarles v. French
611 S.W.2d 757 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1981)
Collins v. Gilbreath
403 N.E.2d 921 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1980)
Barrientos v. Garza
559 S.W.2d 399 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1977)
Mimkon v. Ford
332 A.2d 199 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
472 S.W.2d 102, 251 Ark. 334, 1971 Ark. LEXIS 1140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/veazey-v-stewart-ark-1971.