Vazquez v. State
216 So. 3d 684, 2017 WL 1013135, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 3399
Opinion
Affirmed, without prejudice to file a timely and sufficient postconviction motion. The trial court did not rely on Mr. Vazquez’s pending charges in imposing his sentence. Cf. Fernandez v. State, 42 Fla. L. Weekly D 502a, 212 So.3d 494, 2017 WL [685]*685788407 (Fla. 2d DCA Mar. 1, 2017) (holding that the trial court improperly relied on a subsequent charge in sentencing where the trial court stated she was imposing the sentence “based on the fact that you re-offended” among other reasons).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Vazquez v. State, 216 So. 3d 684, 2017 WL 1013135, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 3399 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).
216 So. 3d 684 (Vazquez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fernandez v. State
212 So. 3d 494 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)