Vazquez v. State
Opinion
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
ADONIS VAZQUEZ, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D14-4865 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) )
Opinion filed March 15, 2017.
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Collier County; Ramiro Mañalich, Judge.
Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Keith W. Upson, Special Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Cornelius C. Demps, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed, without prejudice to file a timely and sufficient postconviction
motion. The trial court did not rely on Mr. Vazquez's pending charges in imposing his
sentence. Cf. Fernandez v. State, 42 Fla. L. Weekly D 502a (Fla. 2d DCA Mar. 1, 2017)
(holding that the trial court improperly relied on a subsequent charge in sentencing where the trial court stated she was imposing the sentence "based on the fact that you
re-offended" among other reasons).
NORTHCUTT, SILBERMAN, and LaROSE, JJ., Concur.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Vazquez v. State (Vazquez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.