Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Vazquez v. State

Vazquez v. State

216 So. 3d 684, 2017 WL 1013135, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 3399
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 15, 2017
DocketCase No. 2D14-4865
StatusPublished

This text of 216 So. 3d 684 (Vazquez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vazquez v. State, 216 So. 3d 684, 2017 WL 1013135, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 3399 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed, without prejudice to file a timely and sufficient postconviction motion. The trial court did not rely on Mr. Vazquez’s pending charges in imposing his sentence. Cf. Fernandez v. State, 42 Fla. L. Weekly D 502a, 212 So.3d 494, 2017 WL [685]*685788407 (Fla. 2d DCA Mar. 1, 2017) (holding that the trial court improperly relied on a subsequent charge in sentencing where the trial court stated she was imposing the sentence “based on the fact that you re-offended” among other reasons).

NORTHCUTT, SILBERMAN, and LaROSE, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fernandez v. State
212 So. 3d 494 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
216 So. 3d 684, 2017 WL 1013135, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 3399, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vazquez-v-state-fladistctapp-2017.