Vazquez-Diaz v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided November 3, 2021·No. 7:21-cv-06757·Unknown

Opinion

Chere Faxed oye OL SID □□ ee □□

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. 4 cement! MALL AL □□□□□ SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK oe pan LUIS A. VAZQUEZ-DIAZ, :

Petitioner, : ORDER

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 21 CV 6757 (VB) Respondent. : ee ee ee eee ee ene enn XK On October 29, 2021, plaintiff filed a motion requesting the Court to order unspecified “New York State facilities” to return “currency” he claims was “confiscated.” (Doc. #18). In an affidavit filed in support of his motion, plaintiff states that the confiscated money amounts to approximately $3,000 and was “returned to petitioner by Judge Hellerstein in 2003; but never placed in petitioner inmate[’s] account at” the Metropolitan Correctional Center, New York. (Doc, #19). Because the Court does not have the authority to grant the relief requested in plaintiff's motion, the motion is DENIED. The Clerk is instructed to terminate the motion. (Doc. #18). The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purposes of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962), Chambers will mail a copy of this Order to plaintiff at the address on the docket. Dated: November 3, 2021 White Plains, NY SO ul Veta Vincent L. Briccetti United States District Judge

Luig A.V 2Q@G€2- 4461-089! Pelidvone, : AFFIDAVET TN BUPAORT OF MOTEOD POR 77 MHASH : RETMBUPSE MET OF MOMEY

Sfales Or America : aiev-ers7Urs.) VR eopondent □

T, Luis A.Vez2Quee-Did2, duly swlova, depose, ond Sodys: Dmeke dais oppidowit in Support OF Pe didionen Modioa Por yeimbuyse mead OF □□□□□□ Qad states os Follows: 2-Thecaariscated money or F Booe dolldrs ,ovso, Was yelurn ed 13 eh H'enen by Judge Hetleasdeia tA 2003; bud Never piace in Pen hignea ia Mdte Seconda} Mec/Wy- □□□□

3 Pedi bionen Ads rs money inkrs jrmote Sccount. □

Y- Pehi Hane (swat hing por Ais monty inoyder 4s buy Coa) edscaWend) Jacks, S: Petidvone 8u7Ge Aorge Ondidle Poy Rvom Lhe WNdte of wew yovk ROU des □□□□ he veimburse immediotely: S¥ute #G7--3354- b- Pelkbrone bok dhwt Re velrer Aeweia sougad 4e gyoA fed Jus¢ oad PYO □□

T ond t penalty op Perdury that dhe esoins is dyue oad Covyect dothe bes ¢ op yw prow ledger Ren petrvlly Sus milted

Ocdoder Zee Purp 0. Deve - Bung CC:

N92 Wd 6z L9G Vane 494440 3S ANCS “PALS

Luis QUue2- Did2,9965I-o54, Petitioner : MoTtow FOR RESMBURSEMENT OF MOWEY -- OGdINS#* ‘ aI-ev- 6757 CLT) Unifed ststes OF ais. : . R Njord

Heyedy Petitions move fhis Court 3s king aaid Court For the yelura oF il Cuwency Conpiscodted, Surge chee: Ord idle poy Promtde New York sfate pacili {feo □□□□□□ —Menbroned ta PUMA PORES, An Operdyud 6 attacked,

Respeeevily Sudmitted asin @. U - Bag Doled: Octo we lh, 2021

CC:

NG: Hed Be : AGdAO FS ONd ANAS CES ABACRSM

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vazquez-Diaz v. United States, (S.D.N.Y. 2021).

Vazquez-Diaz v. United States (Vazquez-Diaz v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)