Vaughn v. Vaughn

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Vaughn v. Vaughn

634 So. 2d 537, 1994 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 33, 1994 WL 12701

CourtCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama

DecidedJanuary 21, 1994

Docket2900494, 2900494X

StatusPublished

This text of 634 So. 2d 537 (Vaughn v. Vaughn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vaughn v. Vaughn, 634 So. 2d 537, 1994 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 33, 1994 WL 12701 (Ala. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

AFTER REMAND PROM THE SUPREME COURT

ROBERTSON, Presiding Judge.

The prior judgment of this court has been reversed by the Supreme Court of Alabama, and the ease remanded for further proceedings. Ex parte Vaughn, 634 So.2d 533 (Ala.1993). Pursuant to the Supreme Court’s instructions, that portion of the judgment of the trial court holding that the husband’s military retirement benefits cannot be included in an award of alimony in gross or in a division of property is reversed, and this case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

In accordance with our original opinion, the judgment is affirmed as to the remaining issues.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

YATES, J., concurs. THIGPEN, J., recuses himself.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

AFTER REMAND PROM THE SUPREME COURT

ROBERTSON, Presiding Judge.

The prior judgment of this court has been reversed by the Supreme Court of Alabama, and the ease remanded for further proceedings. Ex parte Vaughn, 634 So.2d 533 (Ala.1993). Pursuant to the Supreme Court’s instructions, that portion of the judgment of the trial court holding that the husband’s military retirement benefits cannot be included in an award of alimony in gross or in a division of property is reversed, and this case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

In accordance with our original opinion, the judgment is affirmed as to the remaining issues.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

YATES, J., concurs. THIGPEN, J., recuses himself.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

634 So. 2d 537, 1994 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 33, 1994 WL 12701, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vaughn-v-vaughn-alacivapp-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack