Vaughn v. Vaughn

634 So. 2d 537, 1994 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 33, 1994 WL 12701
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Vaughn v. Vaughn. Read the opinion of the Court — 1992 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 239
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama·Decided January 21, 1994·No. 2900494, 2900494X·Published

Opinion

AFTER REMAND PROM THE SUPREME COURT

ROBERTSON, Presiding Judge.

The prior judgment of this court has been reversed by the Supreme Court of Alabama, and the ease remanded for further proceedings. Ex parte Vaughn, 634 So.2d 533 (Ala.1993). Pursuant to the Supreme Court’s instructions, that portion of the judgment of the trial court holding that the husband’s military retirement benefits cannot be included in an award of alimony in gross or in a division of property is reversed, and this case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

In accordance with our original opinion, the judgment is affirmed as to the remaining issues.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

YATES, J., concurs. THIGPEN, J., recuses himself.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vaughn v. Vaughn, 634 So. 2d 537, 1994 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 33, 1994 WL 12701 (Ala. Ct. App. 1994).

634 So. 2d 537 (Vaughn v. Vaughn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex Parte Vaughn
634 So. 2d 533 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1993)