Vaughn v. Cable East Point, Inc.

363 S.E.2d 639, 185 Ga. App. 203, 1987 Ga. App. LEXIS 2448
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 4, 1987
Docket74390
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 363 S.E.2d 639 (Vaughn v. Cable East Point, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vaughn v. Cable East Point, Inc., 363 S.E.2d 639, 185 Ga. App. 203, 1987 Ga. App. LEXIS 2448 (Ga. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinions

Carley, Judge.

Appellant brought suit against appellee and others seeking damages for false arrest and false imprisonment. Pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-37 (d), appellee moved for dismissal of the action with prejudice and the award of reasonable costs, including attorney’s fees, caused by appellant’s alleged failure to comply with discovery procedures. Prior to any ruling on appellee’s motion, appellant voluntarily dismissed her complaint without prejudice. Subsequent to the voluntary dismissal, the trial court entered an award of $500 in attorney’s fees in favor of appellee as reasonable expenses incurred as a result of appellant’s failure to respond to discovery. Appellant filed this direct appeal from the trial court’s order awarding attorney’s fees.

An application for appeal is required in all actions for damages in which the judgment is $2,500 or less. OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (6). While it is true that the $500 was awarded in this case as a sanction, it is nevertheless a “judgment” in favor of appellee in an amount less than $2,500. “As we read the statute, it applies to all judgments for $2,500 or less that arise from an action for damages. Since the suit filed by [appellant] was an action for damages and since this judgment was entered in that action, we find inescapable the conclusion that OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (6) is applicable. It necessarily follows that [appellant’s] failure to invoke the discretion of this court by an application pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-35 requires that this appeal be dismissed. [Cit.]” Gardner v. Villa Monte Homes, 173 Ga. App. 896 (328 SE2d 565) (1985).

Appeal dismissed.

Birdsong, C. J., Deen, P. J., Banke, P. J., [204]*204 Pope and Benham, JJ., concur. McMurray, P. J., Sognier and Beasley, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Janet Baker v. Atlantic States Insurance Company
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2020
Pathfinder Payment Solutions, Inc. v. Global Payments Direct, Inc.
810 S.E.2d 653 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2018)
Anderson v. Laureano
805 S.E.2d 636 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2017)
Hart v. REDMOND REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
686 S.E.2d 130 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2009)
Boyle v. State of Georgia
380 S.E.2d 57 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1989)
Ostrom v. Kapetanakos
365 S.E.2d 849 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1988)
Vaughn v. Cable East Point, Inc.
363 S.E.2d 639 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
363 S.E.2d 639, 185 Ga. App. 203, 1987 Ga. App. LEXIS 2448, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vaughn-v-cable-east-point-inc-gactapp-1987.