Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Vassenelli v. City of Syracuse

Vassenelli v. City of Syracuse

138 A.D.3d 1476, 29 N.Y.S.3d 211
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Vassenelli v. City of Syracuse. Read the opinion of the Court — 138 A.D.3d 1471 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 29, 2016·No. Appeal No. 3·Published

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Hugh A. Gilbert, J.), entered March 4, 2015. The order granted the motion of defendants PMA Management Corp. and Carol Wahl to dismiss the amended complaint against them.

[1477]*1477It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by denying the motion in part and reinstating the third and fourth causes of action against defendants PMA Management Corp. and Carol Wahl, and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Vassenelli v City of Syracuse ([appeal No. 1] 138 AD3d 1471 [2016]).

Present — Smith, J.P., DeJoseph, NeMoyer, Troutman and Scudder, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vassenelli v. City of Syracuse, 138 A.D.3d 1476, 29 N.Y.S.3d 211 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

138 A.D.3d 1476 (Vassenelli v. City of Syracuse) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vassenelli v. City of Syracuse
138 A.D.3d 1471 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)