Vassenelli v. City of Syracuse

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Vassenelli v. City of Syracuse

138 A.D.3d 1476, 29 N.Y.S.3d 211

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 29, 2016

DocketAppeal No. 3

StatusPublished

This text of 138 A.D.3d 1476 (Vassenelli v. City of Syracuse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vassenelli v. City of Syracuse, 138 A.D.3d 1476, 29 N.Y.S.3d 211 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Hugh A. Gilbert, J.), entered March 4, 2015. The order granted the motion of defendants PMA Management Corp. and Carol Wahl to dismiss the amended complaint against them.

[1477]*1477It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by denying the motion in part and reinstating the third and fourth causes of action against defendants PMA Management Corp. and Carol Wahl, and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Vassenelli v City of Syracuse ([appeal No. 1] 138 AD3d 1471 [2016]).

Present — Smith, J.P., DeJoseph, NeMoyer, Troutman and Scudder, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Hugh A. Gilbert, J.), entered March 4, 2015. The order granted the motion of defendants PMA Management Corp. and Carol Wahl to dismiss the amended complaint against them.

[1477]*1477It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by denying the motion in part and reinstating the third and fourth causes of action against defendants PMA Management Corp. and Carol Wahl, and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Vassenelli v City of Syracuse ([appeal No. 1] 138 AD3d 1471 [2016]).

Present — Smith, J.P., DeJoseph, NeMoyer, Troutman and Scudder, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

138 A.D.3d 1476, 29 N.Y.S.3d 211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vassenelli-v-city-of-syracuse-nyappdiv-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack