Varga v. Detroit Edison Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Varga v. Detroit Edison Co.

216 N.W. 374, 240 Mich. 593, 1927 Mich. LEXIS 940

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 1, 1927

DocketDocket No. 107.

StatusPublished

Cited by11 cases

This text of 216 N.W. 374 (Varga v. Detroit Edison Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Varga v. Detroit Edison Co., 216 N.W. 374, 240 Mich. 593, 1927 Mich. LEXIS 940 (Mich. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

Sharpe, C. J.

The declaration alleges that Joseph Varga sustained an accidental injury while in the employ of the defendant in the month of July, 1919. A claim therefor was presented to and considered by the department of labor and industry, and denied on March 25, 1924. A petition for review of this order by certiorari was presented to this court, and denied April 24, 1924. Thereafter, the widow was appointed next friend of the minor children, and brings this action in assumpsit on behalf of herself and as next friend to recover the compensation she claims the department should have awarded.

Both the employer and employee had elected to come under the provisions of the workmen’s compensation law. 2 Comp. Laws 1915, § 5423 eb seq. Section 5426 provides that in such cases the employer shall not be subject to any other liability for the death or personal injury of an employee than is therein provided for. Wall v. Sbudebaker Corp., 219 Mich. 434, 437.

The judgment entered on a verdict directed by the trial court is affirmed.

Bird, Flannigan, Fellows, Wiest, Clark, and McDonald, JJ., concurred. The late Justice Snow took no part in this decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sharpe, C. J.

The declaration alleges that Joseph Varga sustained an accidental injury while in the employ of the defendant in the month of July, 1919. A claim therefor was presented to and considered by the department of labor and industry, and denied on March 25, 1924. A petition for review of this order by certiorari was presented to this court, and denied April 24, 1924. Thereafter, the widow was appointed next friend of the minor children, and brings this action in assumpsit on behalf of herself and as next friend to recover the compensation she claims the department should have awarded.

Both the employer and employee had elected to come under the provisions of the workmen’s compensation law. 2 Comp. Laws 1915, § 5423 eb seq. Section 5426 provides that in such cases the employer shall not be subject to any other liability for the death or personal injury of an employee than is therein provided for. Wall v. Sbudebaker Corp., 219 Mich. 434, 437.

The judgment entered on a verdict directed by the trial court is affirmed.

Bird, Flannigan, Fellows, Wiest, Clark, and McDonald, JJ., concurred. The late Justice Snow took no part in this decision.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

216 N.W. 374, 240 Mich. 593, 1927 Mich. LEXIS 940, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/varga-v-detroit-edison-co-mich-1927.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack