Simon v. Cadillac Motor Car Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Simon v. Cadillac Motor Car Co.

218 N.W. 663, 242 Mich. 93, 1928 Mich. LEXIS 733

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedApril 3, 1928

DocketDocket No. 81.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 218 N.W. 663 (Simon v. Cadillac Motor Car Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Simon v. Cadillac Motor Car Co., 218 N.W. 663, 242 Mich. 93, 1928 Mich. LEXIS 733 (Mich. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

Plaintiffs, children and widow of Charles Simon, deceased, sued the Cadillac Motor Car Company to recover damages alleged to have been suffered because of the failure of the defendant to pay proper compensation under the Michigan workmen's compensation law for the death of said Charles Simon. The declaration alleges that both said Charles Simon and defendant were, at the time of his employment, and at the time of his injuries, subject to the provisions of Act No. 10, Pub. Acts, First Extra Session 1912 (2 Comp. Laws 1915, § 5423 et seq.), and amendments thereto.

Both employer and employee being subject to the workmen's compensation law, their rights and liabilities are governed thereby. This suit cannot be maintained. Section 5426, 2 Comp. Laws 1915; Varga v. Detroit Edison Co., 240 Mich. 593.

Judgment is affirmed, with costs.

FEAD, C.J., and NORTH, FELLOWS, WIEST, CLARK, McDONALD, and SHARPE, JJ., concurred. *Page 95

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Plaintiffs, children and widow of Charles Simon, deceased, sued the Cadillac Motor Car Company to recover damages alleged to have been suffered because of the failure of the defendant to pay proper compensation under the Michigan workmen's compensation law for the death of said Charles Simon. The declaration alleges that both said Charles Simon and defendant were, at the time of his employment, and at the time of his injuries, subject to the provisions of Act No. 10, Pub. Acts, First Extra Session 1912 (2 Comp. Laws 1915, § 5423 et seq.), and amendments thereto.

Both employer and employee being subject to the workmen's compensation law, their rights and liabilities are governed thereby. This suit cannot be maintained. Section 5426, 2 Comp. Laws 1915; Varga v. Detroit Edison Co., 240 Mich. 593.

Judgment is affirmed, with costs.

FEAD, C.J., and NORTH, FELLOWS, WIEST, CLARK, McDONALD, and SHARPE, JJ., concurred. *Page 95

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

218 N.W. 663, 242 Mich. 93, 1928 Mich. LEXIS 733, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simon-v-cadillac-motor-car-co-mich-1928.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack