Vanek v. Indiana National Bank
This text of 551 N.E.2d 1134 (Vanek v. Indiana National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On February 19, 1982 C. Vanek and R. Raymond Caric entered into a security agreement with Indiana National Bank (INB) under the name The Brothers Inc. for purposes of securing a $50,000.00 loan. Simoney and Fred Vanek also signed an unconditional guaranty for payment of the loan if The Brothers failed to make payment. Simoney executed a mortgage on her residence as security for the guaranty. The Brothers did default on the loan, and INB filed a complaint seeking foreclosure on Simoney's mortgage and a deficiency judgment. The trial court entered judgment against Simoney ordering foreclosure, and the Court of Appeals affirmed this judgment. Vanek v. Indiana National Bank (1989), Ind.App., 540 N.E.2d 81. This Court concludes that this decision was correct. We grant the petition to transfer and adopt and affirm the Court of Appeals' decision. - App.Rule 11(B)(8), Ind.Rules of Procedure.
INB has filed a motion for an award of appellate attorney fees pursuant to the provisions of the guaranty agreement. This Court now determines that the agreement supports such an award. This case is remanded to the trial court for a determination as to the proper amount of attorney fees to be awarded to Indiana National Bank.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
551 N.E.2d 1134, 1990 Ind. LEXIS 45, 1990 WL 31984, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vanek-v-indiana-national-bank-ind-1990.