Vandyke v. Walters

88 Ill. 444
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1878
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 88 Ill. 444 (Vandyke v. Walters) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vandyke v. Walters, 88 Ill. 444 (Ill. 1878).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Dickey

delivered the opinion of the Court:

The record in this case shows fraud as charged in the bill, and fully warranted the court, in restoring appellees to their legal rights in the property in question.

The equity of Ashmore’s heirs, as to the 10 acres, spoken of in the proofs as the land of John Walters, was not set up in the pleadings in such manner as to require the court to take notice of it, and it remains unaffected by the decree.

We perceive no wrong in that part of the decree directing a conveyance of the Texas lands to the heirs of Ashmore. At all events, no complaint can be heard from Vandyke or the heirs of Ashmore. Ashmore and Vandyke were both parties to the fraud upon the appellees; and where parties unite in a fraud, they have no such standing in a court of equity as will require that court to adjust nicely the equities between them when their fraudulent transactions are set aside.

Rejecting the testimony of William and George Walters, the evidence in the record abundantly supports the decree.

The decree must be affirmed.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Felt v. Bell
68 N.E. 794 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1903)
Bell v. Felt
102 Ill. App. 218 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1902)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
88 Ill. 444, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vandyke-v-walters-ill-1878.