Vandivere v. Smith

Supreme Court of Georgia

Vandivere v. Smith

188 S.E. 540, 183 Ga. 326, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 599

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 12, 1936·No. No. 11365·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Atkinson, Justice.

The bill of exceptions does not show on its face who are the necessary parties thereto; and the defect not having been cured by amendment, the motion to dismiss must be sustained. Toccoa Electric Power Co. v. Panter, 178 Ga. 258 (173 S. E. 131), and cit.; Poteet v. Beaver, 180 Ga. 383 (178 S. E. 721).

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur. J. Mallory Hunt, for plaintiffs in error. E. Harold Sheats, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Atkinson, Justice.

The bill of exceptions does not show on its face who are the necessary parties thereto; and the defect not having been cured by amendment, the motion to dismiss must be sustained. Toccoa Electric Power Co. v. Panter, 178 Ga. 258 (173 S. E. 131), and cit.; Poteet v. Beaver, 180 Ga. 383 (178 S. E. 721).

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur. J. Mallory Hunt, for plaintiffs in error. E. Harold Sheats, contra.

Vandivere v. Smith, 188 S.E. 540, 183 Ga. 326, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 599 (Ga. 1936).

Pincite

188 S.E. 540 (Vandivere v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related