Dalton v. Ralph E. Mills Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Dalton v. Ralph E. Mills Co.

1 S.E.2d 76, 59 Ga. App. 418, 1939 Ga. App. LEXIS 43

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 30, 1939

Docket27268

StatusPublished

This text of 1 S.E.2d 76 (Dalton v. Ralph E. Mills Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dalton v. Ralph E. Mills Co., 1 S.E.2d 76, 59 Ga. App. 418, 1939 Ga. App. LEXIS 43 (Ga. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Sxjtton, J.

1. Where a bill of exceptions fails to show on its face who is defendant in error, the writ of error must, on motion, be dismissed. Edwards v. Wall, 153 Ga,. 776 (113 S. E. 190); Fowler v. Wheeler, 176 Ga. 189 (167 S. E. 107); Emmanuel Farm Co. v. Batts, 176 Ga. 552 (168 S. E. 316); Malsby v. Shipp, 177 Ga. 54 (169 S. E. 308); Poteet v. Beaver, 180 Ga. 383 (178 S. E. 721); Vandivere v. Smith, 183 Ga. 326 (188 S. E. 540); Federal Deposit Ins. Cor. v. Thompson, 54 Ga. App. 611 (188 S. E. 737).

2. An acknowledgment of service of the bill of exceptions by an attorney of record in the trial court, as attorney for named parties, will not cure the defect above stated. Poteet v. Beaver; Vandivere v. Smith, supra.

Writ or error dismissed.

Stephens, P. J., and Pellon, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sxjtton, J.

1. Where a bill of exceptions fails to show on its face who is defendant in error, the writ of error must, on motion, be dismissed. Edwards v. Wall, 153 Ga,. 776 (113 S. E. 190); Fowler v. Wheeler, 176 Ga. 189 (167 S. E. 107); Emmanuel Farm Co. v. Batts, 176 Ga. 552 (168 S. E. 316); Malsby v. Shipp, 177 Ga. 54 (169 S. E. 308); Poteet v. Beaver, 180 Ga. 383 (178 S. E. 721); Vandivere v. Smith, 183 Ga. 326 (188 S. E. 540); Federal Deposit Ins. Cor. v. Thompson, 54 Ga. App. 611 (188 S. E. 737).

2. An acknowledgment of service of the bill of exceptions by an attorney of record in the trial court, as attorney for named parties, will not cure the defect above stated. Poteet v. Beaver; Vandivere v. Smith, supra.

Writ or error dismissed.

Stephens, P. J., and Pellon, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 S.E.2d 76, 59 Ga. App. 418, 1939 Ga. App. LEXIS 43, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dalton-v-ralph-e-mills-co-gactapp-1939.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack