Vance v. Trimble
This text of 1997 Ohio 121 (Vance v. Trimble) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 80 Ohio St.3d 1208.]
VANCE, APPELLANT, V. TRIMBLE, ACTING ADMR., ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Vance v. Trimble, 1997-Ohio-121.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 96-1074—Submitted September 23, 1997—Decided November 5, 1997.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 95APE08-1020. __________________ Barkan & Neff Co., L.P.A., and Robert E. DeRose, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and James A. Barnes, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Acting Administrator, Bureau of Workers’ Compensation. __________________ {¶ 1} The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1997 Ohio 121, 80 Ohio St. 3d 1208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vance-v-trimble-ohio-1997.