Vance v. State
244 S.W.3d 219, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 155, 2008 WL 222330
Opinion
ORDER
Jonathan Vance appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Vance v. State, 244 S.W.3d 219, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 155, 2008 WL 222330 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).
244 S.W.3d 219 (Vance v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Humphrey v. Verslues Construction
244 S.W.3d 219 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)