Humphrey v. Verslues Construction

Missouri Court of Appeals

Humphrey v. Verslues Construction

244 S.W.3d 219, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 143

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 29, 2008

DocketED 89861

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 244 S.W.3d 219 (Humphrey v. Verslues Construction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Humphrey v. Verslues Construction, 244 S.W.3d 219, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 143 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant appeals from the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming the award of the Administrative Law Judge. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the Commission are supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant appeals from the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming the award of the Administrative Law Judge. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the Commission are supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

244 S.W.3d 219, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/humphrey-v-verslues-construction-moctapp-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack