Van Winkle v. Steneck
192 A. 241, 122 N.J. Eq. 220, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 582
Opinion
We agree with the conclusions reached by the court below and the decree appealed from is affirmed.
For affirmance — Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Cole, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Van Winkle v. Steneck, 192 A. 241, 122 N.J. Eq. 220, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 582 (N.J. 1937).
192 A. 241 (Van Winkle v. Steneck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pratt v. Reuter
79 P.R. 907 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1957)
Pratt v. Curt Reuter
79 P.R. Dec. 962 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1957)