Van Winkle v. Steneck

192 A. 241, 122 N.J. Eq. 220, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 582
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided April 30, 1937·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We agree with the conclusions reached by the court below and the decree appealed from is affirmed.

For affirmance — Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Cole, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Van Winkle v. Steneck, 192 A. 241, 122 N.J. Eq. 220, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 582 (N.J. 1937).

192 A. 241 (Van Winkle v. Steneck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pratt v. Reuter
79 P.R. 907 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1957)
Pratt v. Curt Reuter
79 P.R. Dec. 962 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1957)