Van Vranken v. Circuit Judge
This text of 1 McGrath 327 (Van Vranken v. Circuit Judge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
To vacate an order requiring relator to furnish a bill of particulars, in an action for breach of contract where the damages are unliquidated.
Denied, without costs, April 15, 1891.
Held, that ordinarily an order requiring a-bill of particulars will not be reviewed or disturbed, but in the present case the court went beyond what is properly required to be stated in a bill, and in such case the Supreme Court will correct the action of the trial court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 McGrath 327, 85 McGrath 140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-vranken-v-circuit-judge-mich-1891.