Cummins v. Circuit Judge
This text of 1 McGrath 689 (Cummins v. Circuit Judge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
To set aside a non-suit which was entered because plaintiff, in a suit against a railway company for damages, occasioned by fire from defendant’s right of way, had failed to file or serve a bill of particulars, which had been demanded.
Order to show cause denied October 6, 1896.
Eelator contended that inasmuch as the declaration was ■special, defendant was not entitled to a bill of particulars. Citing
Everett vs. Circuit Judge, 39 M., 437 (332). Kehrig vs. Peters, 41 M., 475; Shadock vs. Plank Road Co., 79 M., 9; Van Vranken vs. Circuit Judge, 85 M., 140 (328).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 McGrath 689, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cummins-v-circuit-judge-mich-1896.