Van Valkenburgh v. Koehler
164 A.D.2d 972, 559 N.Y.S.2d 852, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16820
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Van Valkenburgh v. Koehler. Read the opinion of the Court — 164 A.D.2d 971 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 10, 1990·No. Appeal No. 4·Published
Opinion
Judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs and new trial granted. Same memorandum as in Van Valkenburgh v Koehler ([appeal No. 2] 164 AD2d 971 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Fudeman, J.—negligence and Dram Shop Act violation.) Present—Den-man, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Lowery, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Van Valkenburgh v. Koehler, 164 A.D.2d 972, 559 N.Y.S.2d 852, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16820 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).
164 A.D.2d 972 (Van Valkenburgh v. Koehler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Van Valkenburgh v. Koehler
164 A.D.2d 971 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)