Van Valkenburgh v. Koehler
164 A.D.2d 972, 559 N.Y.S.2d 852, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16820
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedAugust 10, 1990
DocketAppeal No. 4
StatusPublished
This text of 164 A.D.2d 972 (Van Valkenburgh v. Koehler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Van Valkenburgh v. Koehler, 164 A.D.2d 972, 559 N.Y.S.2d 852, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16820 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).
Opinion
Judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs and new trial granted. Same memorandum as in Van Valkenburgh v Koehler ([appeal No. 2] 164 AD2d 971 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Fudeman, J.—negligence and Dram Shop Act violation.) Present—Den-man, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Lowery, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Van Valkenburgh v. Koehler
164 A.D.2d 971 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
164 A.D.2d 972, 559 N.Y.S.2d 852, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16820, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-valkenburgh-v-koehler-nyappdiv-1990.