Van Til v. Environmental Resources Management, Inc.

Michigan Supreme Court

Van Til v. Environmental Resources Management, Inc.

705 N.W.2d 344, 474 Mich. 913, 2005 Mich. LEXIS 2230

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 3, 2005

Docket128283

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 705 N.W.2d 344 (Van Til v. Environmental Resources Management, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Van Til v. Environmental Resources Management, Inc., 705 N.W.2d 344, 474 Mich. 913, 2005 Mich. LEXIS 2230 (Mich. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

705 N.W.2d 344 (2005) 474 Mich. 913

Marcia VAN TIL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

Docket No. 128283. COA No. 250539.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

November 3, 2005.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 10, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall include among the issues briefed whether the trial court had jurisdiction to determine whether plaintiff was an employee, or whether that question must first be resolved in the worker's compensation adjudicatory system. See Reed v. Yackell, 473 Mich. 520, 542, 703 N.W.2d 1 (2005).

We further ORDER that this case be argued and submitted to the Court together with the case of Jacobs v. Technidisc, Inc (Docket No. 128715), 474 Mich. 914, 705 N.W.2d 343 (2005), at such future session of the Court as both cases are ready for submission.

The Michigan Trial Lawyers Association, Michigan Defense Trial Counsel, Inc., the Workers' Compensation Law Section of the State Bar of Michigan, and other interested parties are invited to file amicus briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

705 N.W.2d 344 (2005) 474 Mich. 913

Marcia VAN TIL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

Docket No. 128283. COA No. 250539.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

November 3, 2005.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 10, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall include among the issues briefed whether the trial court had jurisdiction to determine whether plaintiff was an employee, or whether that question must first be resolved in the worker's compensation adjudicatory system. See Reed v. Yackell, 473 Mich. 520, 542, 703 N.W.2d 1 (2005).

We further ORDER that this case be argued and submitted to the Court together with the case of Jacobs v. Technidisc, Inc (Docket No. 128715), 474 Mich. 914, 705 N.W.2d 343 (2005), at such future session of the Court as both cases are ready for submission.

The Michigan Trial Lawyers Association, Michigan Defense Trial Counsel, Inc., the Workers' Compensation Law Section of the State Bar of Michigan, and other interested parties are invited to file amicus briefs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

705 N.W.2d 344, 474 Mich. 913, 2005 Mich. LEXIS 2230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-til-v-environmental-resources-management-inc-mich-2005.

Opinion

Marcia VAN TIL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Marcia VAN TIL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, INC., Defendant-Appellee.