Van Tassell v. Jefferson County

Oregon Supreme Court

Van Tassell v. Jefferson County

177 P. 955, 90 Or. 600, 1919 Ore. LEXIS 8

Oregon Supreme Court·Decided January 21, 1919·Published·Cited by 15 cases

Opinion

PEB CURIAM.

1. This is a motion by defendants to affirm the judgment because of failure of plaintiff to [601]*601file Ms abstract and brief, as required by Eules 6 and 8 of this court.

Plaintiff filed Ms transcript on appeal on August 16, 1918. His time for filing an abstract expired September 5, 1918, and there has been no extension granted, nor is any excuse offered for failure to file the abstract and briefs as required by our rules.

Defendants move the court for an affirmance of the judgment, as provided in Eule 16, and it is so ordered, with costs against plaintiff. Affirmed on Motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PEB CURIAM.

1. This is a motion by defendants to affirm the judgment because of failure of plaintiff to [601]*601file Ms abstract and brief, as required by Eules 6 and 8 of this court.

Plaintiff filed Ms transcript on appeal on August 16, 1918. His time for filing an abstract expired September 5, 1918, and there has been no extension granted, nor is any excuse offered for failure to file the abstract and briefs as required by our rules.

Defendants move the court for an affirmance of the judgment, as provided in Eule 16, and it is so ordered, with costs against plaintiff. Affirmed on Motion.

Van Tassell v. Jefferson County, 177 P. 955, 90 Or. 600, 1919 Ore. LEXIS 8 (Or. 1919).

Pincite

177 P. 955 (Van Tassell v. Jefferson County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related