Berg v. Goldstone

Oregon Supreme Court

Berg v. Goldstone

259 P. 916, 123 Or. 19

DecidedNovember 15, 1927

StatusPublished

This text of 259 P. 916 (Berg v. Goldstone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Berg v. Goldstone, 259 P. 916, 123 Or. 19 (Or. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

*20 PER. CURIAM.

This case came on for hearing and respondent filed a motion to dismiss the appeal and affirm the judgment for the reason that no abstract has been filed as required by Section 554, Or. L., and Rule 6 of this court.

No abstract has ever been filed, nor has any showing been made tending to excuse such neglect. This appeal will therefore be dismissed, and the judgment of the lower court affirmed: Swanson v. Leavens, 26 Or. 561 (40 Pac. 230), Close v. Close, 28 Or. 108 (42 Pac. 128), and Van Tassel v. Jefferson County, 90 Or. 600 (177 Pac. 955). Rehearing Denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*20 PER. CURIAM.

This case came on for hearing and respondent filed a motion to dismiss the appeal and affirm the judgment for the reason that no abstract has been filed as required by Section 554, Or. L., and Rule 6 of this court.

No abstract has ever been filed, nor has any showing been made tending to excuse such neglect. This appeal will therefore be dismissed, and the judgment of the lower court affirmed: Swanson v. Leavens, 26 Or. 561 (40 Pac. 230), Close v. Close, 28 Or. 108 (42 Pac. 128), and Van Tassel v. Jefferson County, 90 Or. 600 (177 Pac. 955). Rehearing Denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

259 P. 916, 123 Or. 19, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berg-v-goldstone-or-1927.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack