Van Poyck v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Van Poyck v. State

347 So. 2d 665, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16146

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 31, 1977

DocketNo. 76-563

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 347 So. 2d 665 (Van Poyck v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Van Poyck v. State, 347 So. 2d 665, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16146 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, William E. Van Poyck, appeals an order denying his motion to vacate sentence pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850.

Initially defendant pled not guilty to charges of breaking and entering and grand larceny (case # 71-10077); possession of stolen property (case # 71-10462); auto theft (case # 71-10703); and robbery (case # 72-992). However, on April 6,1972, pursuant to plea negotiations, defendant pled guilty to the first three charges and was sentenced to concurrent terms of 10 years, 5 years and 5 years respectively. After further plea negotiations, defendant on April 27 pled guilty to the robbery charge (case # 72-992) and was sentenced to 15 years to run concurrently with the above sentences. On February 13, 1976 the defendant filed a motion to vacate the judgments and sentences on the ground that the trial judge erred in accepting his guilty pleas. The motion to vacate was denied. We affirm.

Contrary to defendant’s contention, we are satisfied that his guilty pleas were made voluntarily with the understanding of the charges and the trial judge made adequate inquiry of the defendant with respect thereto.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, William E. Van Poyck, appeals an order denying his motion to vacate sentence pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850.

Initially defendant pled not guilty to charges of breaking and entering and grand larceny (case # 71-10077); possession of stolen property (case # 71-10462); auto theft (case # 71-10703); and robbery (case # 72-992). However, on April 6,1972, pursuant to plea negotiations, defendant pled guilty to the first three charges and was sentenced to concurrent terms of 10 years, 5 years and 5 years respectively. After further plea negotiations, defendant on April 27 pled guilty to the robbery charge (case # 72-992) and was sentenced to 15 years to run concurrently with the above sentences. On February 13, 1976 the defendant filed a motion to vacate the judgments and sentences on the ground that the trial judge erred in accepting his guilty pleas. The motion to vacate was denied. We affirm.

Contrary to defendant’s contention, we are satisfied that his guilty pleas were made voluntarily with the understanding of the charges and the trial judge made adequate inquiry of the defendant with respect thereto.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

347 So. 2d 665, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-poyck-v-state-fladistctapp-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack