Van Orden v. Madow
207 A.D. 827
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 15, 1923·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
Order reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion to vacate order granted, with ten dollars costs, upon the ground that the direction that plaintiff submit to an X-ray photograph is not authorized by Civil Practice Act, section 306. Kelly, P. J., Rich and Manning, JJ., concur; Kelby and Young, JJ., dissent, being of opinion that the X-ray photograph is authorized as an incident of the physical examination.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Van Orden v. Madow, 207 A.D. 827 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1923).
207 A.D. 827 (Van Orden v. Madow) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Adlerstein v. South Nassau Communities Hospital
109 Misc. 2d 158 (New York Supreme Court, 1981)
Carrig v. Oakes
259 A.D. 138 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1940)
Lacqua v. General Linen Supply & Laundry Co.
227 A.D. 794 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1929)
Boyland v. Libman
129 Misc. 415 (New York Supreme Court, 1927)
Meany v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
215 A.D. 834 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1926)