Van Lieu v. Pellegrini

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Van Lieu v. Pellegrini

256 A.D.2d 573, 682 N.Y.S.2d 868, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14025

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 28, 1998·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—In an action to partition real property, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Bergerman, J.), dated January 7, 1998, as denied her cross motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly determined that triable issues of fact exist which preclude summary judgment (see, Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851; Rudnitsky v Robbins, 191 AD2d 488; Matter of Benincasa v Garrubbo, 141 AD2d 636; see also, Dingle v Glass, 247 AD2d 507; Brady v Brady, 203 AD2d 408). Bracken, J. P., Copertino, Thompson and Mc-Ginity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to partition real property, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Bergerman, J.), dated January 7, 1998, as denied her cross motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly determined that triable issues of fact exist which preclude summary judgment (see, Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851; Rudnitsky v Robbins, 191 AD2d 488; Matter of Benincasa v Garrubbo, 141 AD2d 636; see also, Dingle v Glass, 247 AD2d 507; Brady v Brady, 203 AD2d 408). Bracken, J. P., Copertino, Thompson and Mc-Ginity, JJ., concur.

Van Lieu v. Pellegrini, 256 A.D.2d 573, 682 N.Y.S.2d 868, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14025 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

256 A.D.2d 573 (Van Lieu v. Pellegrini) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related